Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SevenSpheresCelestia/Archive
SevenSpheresCelestia
SevenSpheresCelestia (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
17 February 2021
editSuspected sockpuppets
edit- Ardenau4 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ConnallES (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
@SevenSpheresCelestia: has used @ConnallES: to unbalance discussions. They also created Proxima Centauri c using the @SevenSpheresCelestia: account and @ConnallES: says that they created the article. I suspect that @ConnallES: may be a strawman sock. All accounts appear to be mostly editing astronomy articles. @Ardenau4: always tries to minimize the importance of pages created by a certain editor or to propose their merge. They also make similar edits. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 21:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
editAccused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This is likely a bad faith report, please see this open ANI thread. In any case:
- Proxima Centauri c was originally a redirect; I made it into an article. As such, I think I can say that I created it on my userpage. I similarly converted Kepler-90g from a redirect into an article, does that mean User:Dren5144 is my sockpuppet? Of course not.
- As far as I am aware, User:ConnallES has not participated in any discussions that I also participated in.
- As for User:Ardenau4, we do know each other over Discord and sometimes end up editing the same articles. That doesn't mean we're the same person.
I would be fine with a CheckUser confirming that these accounts are not sockpuppets. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 21:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Astonishingly bad faith report. The filer should be blocked for WP:TE/WP:POINTY behaviour. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- I am not trying to do any tendentious editing or disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 15:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Additional comment: since it seems User:ExoEditor thinks that User:Onetwothreeip is also my sockpuppet or "friend", a CheckUser should verify that they are not a sockpuppet either. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 16:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- I firmly support the total and permanent ban of SevenSpheresCelestia, who is now closing ANI's against him (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&action=history).
- SevenSpheresCelestia has (suspiciously) semi-retired today, and apparently he now enters Wikipedia just to vandalize it.
- I highly suggest an immediate ban of this user and all his possible sockpuppet accounts.
- Won't further comment this. Cheers. ExoEditor 21:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- I did not close your ANI thread; I reverted your disruptive reversion of its closure. I placed the semi-retired template on my user page because I am tired of being constantly harassed by users like yourself, and intend to reduce my activity on Wikipedia once this situation is resolved. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 21:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging @Black Kite: from ANI. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 21:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
editTo say the least, I'm unconvinced.
- 1. The number of pages edited by all three accounts is zero.
- 2. Ardenau4 appears to be in a different timezone per timecard.
- 3.
"SevenSpheresCelestia: has used @ConnallES: to unbalance discussions."
. SevenSpheresCelestia and ConnallES have never edited the same discussion. - 4.
They also created Proxima Centauri c using the @SevenSpheresCelestia: account and @ConnallES: says that they created the article
ConnallES created the article on 28/5/19 as a stub; it was converted back to a redirect by Elmidae the next day. SevenSpheresCelestial then recreated the article as a fully-blown on 29/7/20. - 5. This all appears to be related to an argument about some articles that is currently the subject of some disruptive editing at ANI.
- I would suggest just closing this. Black Kite (talk) 21:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)